As an atheist and secular Jew, I favor the resolution from Rep. Scott Krug, R-Wisconsin Rapids, to identify the conifer that sits in the Capitol rotunda during the Christmas season as a Christmas tree.
Calling it a holiday tree merely makes less conspicuous why the tree has no place in a state Capitol. On the other hand, recognizing it as a Christmas tree, which it obviously is, makes explicit the state's promotion of religion and its defiance of the Constitution's demand that we keep church and state separate.
You have free articles remaining.
A Christmas tree does not belong in the state Capitol. But if we must have one, let's not disguise what it is. We should make perfectly clear that those who want a tree are betraying the Constitution.
Larry Shapiro, Madison