Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
Small council may be easier to buy -- Eric Cabot

Small council may be easier to buy -- Eric Cabot

{{featured_button_text}}

I completely agree with former Madison Mayor Dave Cieslewicz's Feb. 7 letter to the editor, which expressed opposition to the proposal to reduce the size of the Madison City Council and make council members positions full time. I need not repeat or restate his perfectly sensible arguments.

In my view, reduction of the number of council members will result in a reduction of avenues for public input on city governance and a dilution of the representation of individual neighborhoods. As things stand now, I am well represented by my current council member and worry that this would not be the case if four or more representatives were replaced by a single professional politician.

Furthermore, this could yield more power to rich and powerful private entities, potentially at the expense of the will of ordinary people. This follows another recently announced policy proposal to reduce or eliminate residents’ input on housing developments in their own neighborhoods.

That is not the only way that these plans may aid private interests. With fewer council members to pressure, the job of well-financed lobbyists will just get easier. Now that’s what I call the best government that money can buy.

Eric Cabot, Madison

Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

News Alerts

Badger Sports

Breaking News

Crime

Politics