Skip to main content
You are the owner of this article.
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
Wisconsin Supreme Court refuses to take up challenge to Dane County mask mandate
alert top story topical
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT

Wisconsin Supreme Court refuses to take up challenge to Dane County mask mandate

Wisconsin Supreme Court

The entrance to the Wisconsin Supreme Court chambers in the state Capitol.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court declined to take up a conservative legal group’s challenge to Dane County’s mask mandate in a 4-3 ruling issued Friday afternoon.

The court refused to exercise its own jurisdiction over the recent public health order, instead leaving it up to the state’s lower courts to consider any future legal challenges first.

The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty challenged the mask mandate in a lawsuit on behalf of Sun Prairie resident Bryant Stempski against Dane County and Madison, their joint public health department, and the department’s director, Janel Heinrich, asking the court to “declare the relevant county and city ordinances unconstitutional,” according to court documents.

WILL claims that previous rulings by the court limit the powers of local public health officers and a mask order like the one issued in Dane County must be approved through legislative action.

Under Dane County’s order, everyone age 2 and older must wear a face covering when in any enclosed space open to the public where other people, except for members of the person’s own household, could be present. The mandate remains in effect until Sept. 16.

The four justices in the majority did not provide further elaboration on the court’s order. The three dissenting justices, all conservatives, argued the court had refused its responsibility to determine “what the law is” and what authority public health officials have to issue compulsory mandates.

“The court’s failure to act in this case deprives the entire state of any timely resolution of the important issues presented,” Justice Rebecca Bradley wrote in her dissent.

Despite Friday’s ruling, the state’s highest court has gone against previous pandemic restrictions and mitigation efforts. The court’s conservative majority struck down Gov. Tony Evers’ COVID-19 emergency order and statewide mask mandate in April. Another ruling in June determined that public health officials do not have the authority to close schools.

The three dissenting justices included Chief Justice Annette Ziegler and justices Bradley and Patience Roggensack, who wrote separately from the other two. The majority included liberal justices Ann Walsh Bradley, Rebecca Dallet and Jill Karofsky and conservative Brian Hagedorn, who has been a swing vote on previous COVID-related court cases.

Get Government & Politics updates in your inbox!

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

News Alerts

Badger Sports

Breaking News

Crime

Politics