Skip to main content
You are the owner of this article.
You have permission to edit this article.
Lame-duck bill would change WEDC job verification requirements
breaking topical top story

Lame-duck bill would change WEDC job verification requirements

From the Full report: Catch up and read the latest on the Wisconsin lame-duck session series
  • 0

With the Legislature’s fast-tracked lame-duck session work wrapped up, opponents of the legislation shifted their efforts to persuading Gov. Scott Walker to use his veto pen one last time before leaving office.

Walker spokesman Tom Evenson said Thursday the governor’s office was reviewing the bills, but did not offer a timeline for when Walker might act on them. He could sign the bills as passed or veto part or all of them, something he has rarely done outside the budget process during his eight years in office.

On Thursday afternoon, the Legislative Fiscal Bureau released summaries of the bills as passed by the Legislature.

The summaries include at least one provision not previously disclosed. It would remove a statutory requirement that the Wisconsin Economic Development Corp. annually verify information submitted by tax credit recipients before a company can obtain the tax credit. Under the new bill, WEDC would annually verify only a sample of tax credit claimant information and rely on signed statements from other companies that they had created the required jobs.

The agency has previously had trouble complying with the state requirement that it verify job numbers.

Another provision specifies that the WEDC board has the power to appoint and supervise the point person acting on behalf of the state for the $10 billion Foxconn Technology Group manufacturing campus being built in Racine County. Currently, the person works within the Department of Administration.

Meanwhile, some Wisconsin residents said their calls to Walker’s office were going unanswered.

Madison resident Kathie Free, 73, said she called Walker’s office five times over the past few days during normal business hours and has yet to have someone answer. Sometimes the call indicated a busy signal and other times the phone rang about 20 to 30 times before disconnecting. At no point did the call go to a voicemail box where she could leave a message, she said.

She said she has heard from three friends that encountered the same problem.

Free, a Democrat, said if she could reach Walker’s office, she would urge him not to sign the sweeping series of bills curbing the power of incoming Democratic Gov. Tony Evers.

“Basically the democracy we have in this state is being destroyed,” she said. “It’s horrible. It’s corrupt.”

At a Wednesday news conference, Evers and other incoming Democratic officeholders urged people to contact the governor’s office to share their opinion of the bills.

Cee Cee Cohen, a retired Madison science teacher, attempted to do that on three separate occasions.

“It became clear to me that they’re either overwhelmed or they’re ignoring the call,” she said, referring to Walker’s office.

After venting on Facebook — where about half a dozen other friends chimed in reporting the same difficulty — Cohen said a staffer picked up on her fourth phone call. Cohen told the staffer, who she said did not want to take down her name, that she felt her vote was being stolen.

Evenson said Walker’s office had received phone calls at a volume “a little higher than normal” over the last few days. He said one person at the front desk and three others in a constituent services division are staffing the office phones from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.Evenson said multiple staffers in the governor’s office are helping those four people answer calls in response to the volume. He said he did not immediately have a tally of the number of phone calls received.

“We’re certainly happy to take everybody’s phone calls and everyone’s comments and we’re trying to keep up with the demand as best we can,” he said.

Former conservative talk radio host Charlie Sykes, who helped lay the groundwork for Republicans to take control of state government in 2010 but has been shunned by some for opposing President Donald Trump’s smash-mouth brand of politics, appealed to Walker, writing in The Atlantic that signing the bills would be a “huge mistake” that “will tarnish his reputation in ways that I’m not sure he grasps.”

“They have managed to energize the progressive base, expose themselves as sore losers, and undermine crucial democratic norms,” Sykes wrote. “And in return … they got extraordinarily little.”

The lone Republican state senator who voted against the most controversial of the three bills explained his dissenting vote Thursday in a statement.

Sen. Robert Cowles, of Green Bay, highlighted three parts of the last bill — limiting early voting, changing the administrative rule process and automatically rescinding guidance documents for field staff managing state programs — that he said will have unforeseen impacts on businesses, property owners, outdoor enthusiasts and voters throughout Wisconsin.

Cowles said he supported the two other bills because provisions such as establishing work requirements for adult welfare recipients had previously been introduced in the legislative process and included opportunities for the public to provide input.

“These bills do not strip powers from the incoming Governor, but instead ensure that administration doesn’t strip powers from the Legislature,” Cowles said.

Rep. Janel Brandtjen, R-Menomonee Falls, issued a statement defending the bills, saying the powers of the governor, Legislature and attorney general “are clearly defined in the Wisconsin Constitution and cannot be changed without a statewide referendum.”

“Governor Evers is not a victim,” Brandtjen said. “Changes to appointments and additional transparency are simply good government.”

Walker is in an unusual situation as Wisconsin has previously had only five post-election extraordinary or special legislative sessions in state history, according to the Legislative Reference Bureau. Those include:

  • A January 1928 session on appropriations for state colleges and public welfare.
  • A December 1970 session confirming appointments.
  • A November 1974 session on collective bargaining agreements for state employees.
  • A December 1978 session confirming appointments and about special election laws.
  • A December 2010 session on collective bargaining agreements.

The scope of the bills that passed Wednesday morning after a marathon session conducted mostly behind closed doors is far broader than the previous post-election sessions.

The various provisions limit early voting to two weeks before an election, give the Legislature oversight of state litigation including participation in a lawsuit challenging the Affordable Care Act, allow lawmakers to hire outside lawyers rather than the attorney general in legal matters, prevent Evers from banning guns in the Capitol, and codify various rules on voter ID and Medicaid work requirements.

Editor's Note: This story has been corrected to note there have only been five previous special and extraordinary sessions after an election. Also a provision in the bills moving a Foxconn liaison position from DOA to WEDC was previously disclosed in an LFB memo on Monday.


Get Government & Politics updates in your inbox!

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Badger Sports

Breaking News