You are the owner of this article.
Despite GOP resistance, Tony Evers can restore some environmental protections
topical top story

Despite GOP resistance, Tony Evers can restore some environmental protections


Conservationists believe public concern about flooding could prompt some Republican lawmakers to support stronger wetland protections after Democratic Gov. Tony Evers takes office in January. Above, 10-year-old Gabe Wienkes uses sandbags and a pump in an effort to keep water from the Door Creek wetlands away from a home in the town of Pleasant Springs earlier this year.

Wisconsin’s newly elected governor and attorney general say they plan to tighten environmental protections that were relaxed during eight years of one-party Republican rule.

But with the GOP’s continued control of the state Legislature, Democratic Gov.-elect Tony Evers’ options will be limited.

Assembly Majority Leader Jim Steineke, R-Kaukauna, said Wednesday that there would be no “backsliding” from laws enacted under Walker. Top leaders of the Assembly and the Senate went further, talking about stripping the governor of unspecified powers.

Still, even without cooperation from lawmakers, there are some potentially significant moves Evers and Attorney General-elect Josh Kaul will be able to make when they take office in January.

And conservationists say they hope lawmakers will agree to modest revisions to the various laws that have loosened environmental protections since 2010.

Republicans have said they cut regulations to help businesses, but Evers and Kaul promised to strike a better balance that preserves water and air quality and doesn’t allow violators of pollution laws to gain an advantage over competitors that meet standards.

“A good economy and clean environment can go hand in hand, but we must use science to ensure the proper balance,” Evers said. “I will select career professionals with the skills and experience to fulfill the (DNR’s) duties for executive positions, eschewing Walker’s penchant for appointing political operatives and donors.”

Evers and Kaul have both criticized the fall-off in enforcement of pollution laws since 2010. They should be able to take a tougher stance without help from lawmakers.

Evers will have authority to direct the Department of Natural Resources to pursue serious violations more aggressively, while Kaul will be able to make sure the Department of Justice seeks stiffer court-ordered financial penalties for the worst offenders.

Tony Evers


Evers’ DNR may also be able to strengthen routine regulation of air and water polluters to prevent violations, boost the role of science in policymaking, improve enforcement of fish and game regulations, and mount a more aggressive effort to control chronic wasting disease in the deer herd.

But even internal agency changes could be hobbled if the Legislature refuses to increase the department budget, or at least to allow a reorganization of staff to meet new goals. Evers could, however, have an ace in the hole in the governor’s powerful “partial veto” power.

It allows Wisconsin governors to delete whole sections — or single words — of budget language in ways that can enact the opposite of what legislators wanted.

Groundwater protections

Evers probably won’t need the veto power, or help from lawmakers, to add a layer of protection to public waters that are vulnerable to over-pumping by high-capacity wells.

Manure-polluted tap water

Manure-laden tap water in Wisconsin has led to calls for stronger controls on agricultural pollution, which is responsible for less visible nitrate pollution of one-third of wells. Kewaunee County conservation officer Davina Bonness collected this tap water from a homeowner in 2016. It contained animal waste that matched manure spread on a nearby farm field.

Prompted by a 2016 opinion issued by Schimel, the DNR has approved billions of gallons of groundwater withdrawals from places where state scientists said lakes, streams and drinking water would harmed.

Kaul says Schimel’s view of the DNR’s powers is flawed. The new attorney general could write his own opinion asserting the DNR has authority to go back to giving more scrutiny to high-capacity well applications, said Carl Sinderbrand, a former assistant state attorney general who has criticized Schimel.

Kaul and Evers also will be able to replace top managers in their departments, after critics accused the current administration of allowing too much political influence on agency decisions.

Schimel appointed former industry lobbyists and advocates to key posts. Walker hired former Republican lawmakers who lacked strong backgrounds in natural resources to run the DNR, saying he wanted to help regulate businesses.

Evers and Kaul are likely to pull the state out of lawsuits aimed at fighting federal regulations or helping private entities, including an oil company and a major financial supporter of Republican political candidates.

With Walker’s approval, Schimel joined on behalf of the state in 82 multi-state friend-of-the-court briefs — including efforts to halt the Affordable Care Act and stop pollution regulations — mostly in cases championed by other GOP officials.

States with Democratic governors and attorneys general are in court to preserve the Affordable Care Act, protect the environment, keep questions about citizenship status out of the census, protect equal access to Internet service and oppose anti-immigration measures.

With or without lawmakers

Evers will need legislative help to fulfill other goals.

Since 2011, Walker and the Legislature have passed a series of laws loosening environmental regulations at the request of business operators. They also cut the DNR, removed tax support from parks and limited purchases of recreational land.

Development of wetlands has accelerated and both the federal government and a nonpartisan state audit found the DNR wasn’t enforcing laws.

Evers has criticized the law changes, budget cuts and the absence of a concerted search for solutions to widespread pollution of lakes, streams and drinking water. As governor, he will be able to bring together varied groups to study the problems.

Persuading the Legislature to restore the DNR budget might be difficult, but there are areas where lawmakers might agree to changes in laws, said George Meyer, a former DNR secretary who now heads the Wisconsin Wildlife Federation.

Walker and lawmakers were often on the same page, but in 2015 the Assembly bucked Walker’s plan to stop purchases of land for outdoor recreation for 13 years.

With Walker gone, the Assembly might consider an Evers proposal for more land purchases through the Nelson-Knowles Stewardship Program, although it may be less likely the state Senate would agree, Meyer said.

Meyer also saw hope that some Republican lawmakers might agree to increase fishing and hunting license fees, something the wildlife federation has sought for years to help fund fish stocking, game habitat improvement and poaching enforcement.

Public concerns about flooding could help Evers argue for changes in a 2017 law making it easier for builders to develop wetlands near populated areas, and unhappiness over water pollution could create support for amendments to other laws, Meyer said.

There may also be support for revising a 2011 law that has made it much more time-consuming to change agency rules like DNR pollution regulations, Meyer said.

Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester, and Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald, R-Juneau, didn’t respond to questions about whether they would consider those kinds of proposals.

Rep. Jim Steineke


Steineke, the Assembly majority leader, who championed looser wetland protections last year, said last week he would seek “common interests” with Evers, but within bounds.

“I and my colleagues in the Assembly will not allow for backsliding,” Steineke said. “We will stand by our reforms passed over the last eight years that have made government more efficient and responsive to its citizens.”

Meyer and leaders of other conservation groups said they would be watching an extraordinary legislative session that is to start Monday to see if lawmakers try to loosen environmental regulations further while Walker is still in office to sign changes into law.


Capital W: Plug in to Wisconsin politics

Subscribe to our Politics email!

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Steven Verburg is a reporter for the Wisconsin State Journal covering state politics with a focus on science and the environment as well as military and veterans issues.

Related to this story

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Badger Sports

Breaking News