Madison has been chosen to host a squadron of F-35 fighter jets.
The U.S. Air Force announced Wednesday that it will send the new jets to the Wisconsin Air National Guard’s 115th Fighter Wing and the 187th Fighter Wing in Montgomery, Alabama, capping more than three years of study and deep community division over the planes, which come with the promise of jobs and new construction but also noise and pollution.
“The Department of the Air Force selected the 115th Fighter Wing and the 187th Fighter Wing as the next Air National Guard locations to receive the F-35A,” Air Force Secretary Barbara Barrett wrote in a statement. “Putting F-35s at these two bases continues our transition into the next generation of air superiority.”
Maj. Gen. Paul Knapp, Wisconsin’s adjutant general, in a statement called the decision “a bright day” for the state’s National Guard and said the new mission will continue a 72-year tradition of fulfilling state and federal missions.
“The decision represents the hard work and professionalism of the citizen Airmen who have proven time and time again that we stand ready to answer the call both as the Air Force’s combat reserve and as the state’s first military responder during emergencies,” Knapp said.
Madison and Montgomery will join active-duty bases in Alaska, Utah and the U.K. and a National Guard unit in Burlington, Vermont, as the only sites yet to host the $90 million jets, which are expected to begin arriving in 2023 and will replace the current fleet of 1980s-model F-16s.
The 115th Fighter Wing was one of five units under consideration to receive the new jets, which will require up to $120 million in new construction and dozens of new jobs at Truax Field.
Wing commander Col. Erik Peterson said it’s an honor to be one of the first guard units chosen for the mission.
“I am humbled by the incredible performance and dedication of our Airmen, executing both our federal and state missions,” he said. “And we are committed to working with our community partners during this transition.”
The Air Force said it will continue flying a mix of F-35s and fourth-generation fighters, such as the F-16, into the 2040s.
“This will allow the Air Force to maintain enough fighters to meet combatant commander requirements, provide required training, and allow a reasonable and uninterrupted deployment tempo for the force,” the Air Force said in its statement.
U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Oshkosh, announced the decision Wednesday morning, saying it “ensures Wisconsin’s 115th Fighter Wing will now receive a critical upgrade with the F-35 replacing the aging F-16 fighter jets currently in service.”
Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Madison, hailed the economic impact and said she would continue working with the Air Force and Dane County “to make sure this positive development works for our community.”
Zach Brandon, executive director of the Greater Madison Chamber of Commerce, which led efforts to rally support for the mission, called the decision “much needed positive news” for Madison and noted the value the 1,200 members of the unit bring to the community.
“We look forward to greater Madison continuing to be their home for decades to come,” Brandon said.
Madison Mayor Satya Rhodes-Conway, who had expressed concerns about the environmental impact of the mission, did not respond to a request for comment.
Opponents expressed dismay at the decision, which they say will bring noise and other pollution that will disproportionately affect minority and low-income residents of neighborhoods near the airport.
“They obviously didn’t listen to our community and don’t care about destroying our neighborhoods,” said state Rep. Chris Taylor, D-Madison, who represents the district surrounding the airport and has been a leading voice for the opposition.
Four Madison City Council members representing districts near the airport said the environmental impacts go against the city’s values “of equity, sustainability, health and adaptability” and undermine “multiple long-term goals” of policy makers.
“We are saddened by this decision, but will continue (to) stand with our neighbors in opposition,” Alds. Syed Abbas, Rebecca Kemble, Grant Foster and Marsha Rummel said in a statement.
The City Council passed a resolution in March opposing the selection of Truax for the F-35s.
The Safe Skies Clean Water coalition has challenged the Air Force’s environmental review as insufficient.
U.S. Rep. Mark Pocan, D-Black Earth, said the Air Force has so far not answered his questions about how residents affected by the decision would be made whole.
“We’re hoping now that these jets are coming to Truax, the Air Force can be more forthright with the information we’ve requested over the last nine months,” Pocan said. “Thus far, my concerns have never been directly addressed.”
According to the Air Force’s contested environmental impact study, the new mission will involve 27% more takeoffs and landings than the 115th flies now, exposing more than 1,000 additional homes to average daily noise of 65 decibels or more — a level deemed “incompatible” with residential use, though not uninhabitable.
However, the Air National Guard has suggested that staffing, weather and future deployments will limit the increase in flights.
There are still questions about how much louder the F-35s will be.
According to the final environmental impact study, the F-35 would be about 5 decibels louder than the current F-16s on takeoff, though opponents said those figures were based on studies done in California that may not apply in Wisconsin. The threshold for human perception is generally a change of about 3 decibels, while an increase of 10 decibels is perceived as doubling the noise level.
Of the five bases that were under consideration, only Michigan’s Selfridge was expected to see more people affected by increased noise levels.
The study found noise would disproportionately affect low-income and minority residents, which would also be the case in Michigan and in Montgomery, which was also selected Wednesday to receive the jets.
While maintaining the jets would have a “negligible impact” on Madison’s housing market, the final environmental impact study acknowledges lost property values could cost the county up to 0.27% of its tax base — or more than $171 million.
It will be up to the Dane County Regional Airport to conduct a study once the planes are in place to determine which homes could receive federal noise mitigation funds, although hundreds of homeowners are ineligible because of easements granted in the 1990s.
“No resident should be responsible for damages that are no fault of their own,” Pocan said, noting he has requested that the Air Force provide mitigation funding and is drafting legislation but said there needs to be a “unified call from the community.”
Construction to accommodate the new jets will also involve moving soil contaminated with hazardous PFAS compounds left over from years of firefighter training.
The National Guard has agreed to prepare a plan for handling contaminated soil and water during construction. That plan would be subject to approval by the DNR, which can set site-specific targets.
Photos: See historic Edgewater hotel through the years
Rigadoon Bar, 1949
Edgewater exterior, 1949
Ghandi and Nehru, 1949
Women on pier, 1950s
Royal Suite, 1950
Front desk, 1950s
Jimmy Dorsey, 1951
The Edgewater hotel, 1957
Edgewater, 1978 construction
Edgewater pier, 1989
Edgewater hotel pier, 1991
Edgewater roof, 1997
Edgewater celebrities, 2009
Edgewater exterior, 2009
Edgewater addition, 2009
Edgewater at sunset, 2009
Liquidation sale, 2012
Edgewater construction, 2013
Edgewater construction, 2013
Ice skating at Edgewater, 2014
Edgewater spa, 2014
Edgewater spiral staircase, 2014
Hotel bathroom, 2014
The Edgewater at sunset, 2014
The Boathouse, 2015
Movie at The Edgewater, 2016
Edgewater aerial view, 2018
Be the first to know
Get local news delivered to your inbox!