Skip to main content
You are the owner of this article.
You have permission to edit this article.
Enbridge withdraws condemnation request for Line 5 reroute
topical top story

Enbridge withdraws condemnation request for Line 5 reroute

  • 0

A Canadian company has withdrawn its request to condemn private land in order to reroute a controversial oil pipeline around a northern Wisconsin Indian reservation.

Enbridge Energy notified utility regulators Friday that it was withdrawing its application for the authority to take private property for its Line 5 reroute and announced Monday that it has negotiated rights for all the private land needed, though the company is still working to secure permits to cross roads and utility corridors.

As a result of a lawsuit filed by the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, Enbridge is working to remove a 12-mile segment and bypass the reservation with about 42 miles of new pipe through Ashland and Iron counties.

Enbridge Line 5 reroute map

Enbridge had asked the Public Service Commission to determine the project was in the public interest and grant the company eminent domain powers. The company withdrew its application on the deadline for responses to legal challenges from groups including the Sierra Club, Honor the Earth, the League of Women Voters, the Superior Rivers Watershed Association, and 350 Madison, along with landowners who oppose the line.

Michigan governor says Enbridge dodging responsibility for potential spill in Straits of Mackinac

The project will still require permits from the state Department of Natural Resources, which is preparing a draft environmental impact statement expected to be released this fall.

More than 100 people called on the agency to deny the permits during a five-hour public hearing last month, citing threats to the climate as well as the land, water and people.

Sierra Club state director Elizabeth Ward said the environmental organization would continue fighting to block the project.

“There is a long permitting process ahead of us,” Ward said. “The unprecedented opposition has been building throughout the summer and growing as awareness increases about the risks to the watershed, wetlands, tribal sovereignty, and climate.”

The company says the line, which transports an average of 540,000 barrels a day between Superior and southwestern Ontario, is a key piece of energy infrastructure.

Enbridge wins Wisconsin Supreme Court battle over oil pipeline insurance

According to Enbridge, the line delivers liquified natural gas to a Plains Midstream Canada terminal in Rapid River, Michigan, that supplies propane to dealers in Michigan and Wisconsin.

Opponents point to dozens of spills on Enbridge pipelines over the past 20 years, including a 2010 rupture in Michigan that cost $1.2 billion to clean up.


Be the first to know

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Environmental and tribal groups say Enbridge Energy’s plan to rebuild Line 3, which would carry Canadian tar sands oil and regular crude from Alberta to Wisconsin, would worsen climate change and risk spills in sensitive areas where Native Americans harvest wild rice, hunt, fish, gather medicinal plants, and claim treaty rights.

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Badger Sports

Breaking News