Dear Editor: In their defense of what is increasingly difficult to defend, We Energies executives present us with a stark choice — either we continue to burn coal or we risk losing power during the next polar vortex. It’s a false dilemma, a fear tactic that’s much more persuasive than arguing to protect shareholder returns.
The argument that coal is more reliable is one of the last excuses left for the company that must justify paying more for a fuel source that pollutes our air and water and contributes greatly to our climate crisis. The truth is that as more coal plants are retired, utilities have successfully adopted a variety of strategies and technologies to keep pace with a rapidly evolving energy industry. No one has been left shivering in the dark.
New leadership at We Energies might recognize that time spent defending the fuel of the 19th century is time wasted at a critical moment. More flexible, innovative management would understand that the $75 million dollars a year ratepayers lose by keeping the outdated South Oak Creek coal plant operating is money better spent preparing for a future that will depend on carbon-free electricity.
The real dilemma we face demands that we take dramatic action to reduce carbon emissions or we will leave a degraded world and more difficult lives for our children. We need a utility that understands the urgency of this problem and chooses to lead rather than delay this necessary transition.
Send your letter to the editor to email@example.com. Include your full name, hometown and phone number. Your name and town will be published. The phone number is for verification purposes only. Please keep your letter to 250 words or less.
Catch the latest in Opinion
Get opinion pieces, letters and editorials sent directly to your inbox weekly!