Can Meghan profit from her celebrity status? What about the couple's tax situation? A look at the latest updates regarding Harry and Meghan's step back from the royal family.
Why have their plans caused a crisis?
The crisis gripping Britain’s royal family over Prince Harry’s plan to step down from royal duties moves to Queen Elizabeth II’s rural retreat in eastern England Monday afternoon. The 93-year-old monarch has summoned Prince Charles, heir to the throne, and his sons, princes William and Harry, to Sandringham House to thrash out difficult issues that may take weeks to resolve. Harry’s wife Meghan is expected to take part by telephone from Canada.
Prince Harry and Meghan, formally known as the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, are charismatic senior royals known throughout the world. Many saw them as playing a vital role in building the monarchy's popularity with future generations. But they both seem disillusioned and unhappy and have now said they want to step back from royal duties, become financially independent, and spend much of their time in North America. This has caused a fissure at the highest ranks of the world's best known royal family.
Can they break away from taxpayer support?
Harry and Meghan have said on their website that they will no longer use a fund called the Sovereign Grant to pay for a small part of their office costs. The grant is provided by Britain's Treasury to fund the monarchy — last year it totalled more than 80 million pounds ($104 million). The couple said they would still use public money to pay for official overseas trips carried out at the request of the government and continue to use the recently renovated Frogmore Cottage as their U.K. base — if the queen agrees to allow them to use what is part of the Crown Estate. The queen and her government have not formally agreed to any new arrangement.
Will Prince Charles keep helping out?
Each year, Charles receives a substantial amount of revenue from the Duchy of Cornwall estate that was established in 1337. He’s not allowed to sell any of its considerable assets, but he receives income from it each year and uses it to fund many of his activities, along with those of his wife Camilla, William and his wife Kate, and Harry and Meghan. Last year the income amounted to more than 20 million pounds. It is not at all clear that Charles would want to provide extensive support for Harry, 35, and Meghan, 38, if they are no longer carrying out royal duties. This may be a key issue at the talks.
What about Prince William and Prince Harry's relationship?
LONDON — Britain's Prince William and his younger brother, Prince Harry, refuted as "false" a British newspaper story on their strained relationship.
"Despite clear denials, a false story ran in a UK newspaper today speculating about the relationship between the Duke of Sussex and the Duke of Cambridge," a Buckingham Palace statement read.
"For brothers who care so deeply about the issues surrounding mental health, the use of inflammatory language in this way is offensive and potentially harmful," it adds.
The joint statement did not name the newspaper, but a palace spokesman told dpa it referred to the Times, which ran a front page story over a rift between the brothers.
According to the newspaper report, Harry and his wife Meghan, duchess of Sussex, considered they were subjected to a "bullying" attitude from William, the Duke of Cambridge.
Visit Deutsche Presse-Agentur GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) at www.dpa.de/English.82.0.html
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Can Meghan profit from her celebrity status?
There is very little doubt that Meghan would be a very attractive brand ambassador for some of the top fashion and fragrance houses, and potentially be on a par with the likes of Julia Roberts, Nicole Kidman and Keira Knightley. But any overtly financial arrangement like this could easily clash with any royal duties Meghan and Harry have said they plan to continue on a part-time basis.
It could also appear unseemly for a royal to cash in like this. It’s not clear if the queen and the rest of the family would be comfortable with this approach to financial independence.
Could Meghan return to acting?
It's the circle of life.
After trading in acting for royalty, Markle is officially returning to her comfort zone.
The Duchess of Sussex has already signed a deal with Disney, after announcing Wednesday that she and husband Prince Harry would "work to become financially independent" as they "step back as 'senior' members of the Royal Family," after reportedly feeling "driven out," according to The Times Saturday.
The former "Suits" star will reportedly perform a voiceover for an unidentified Disney project that will benefit Elephants Without Borders, which aims to shield the majestic mammals for poaching.
No word on the impetus for the deal, but Walt Disney Studios' Disneynature leg produces nature documentaries consistently narrated by A-list celebrities — including Meryl Streep for "Wings of Life" and Morgan Freeman for "L'Empereur" — and donates film proceeds to conservation and wildlife organizations.
The report notes there is not yet confirmation of a commercial deal signed by either the Duke or Duchess that will contribute to their personal finances, but alleges that their tense discussions with the royal family prior to Christmas included accusations the couple had already brokered deals "with firms including Disney."
Last summer, the couple also endorsed Disney's remake of "The Lion King," the London premiere for which was held "in support of the conservation and communities work" by the Royal Foundation of the Duke.
After the couple dropped their bombshell news, Bravo network royalty Andy Cohen said that Markle had an "open invite … to join" reality series "Real Housewives of Beverly Hills" — on which he serves as an executive producer.
The Walt Disney Company did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Armed security for senior royals is provided by a special unit of the Metropolitan Police and other agencies. This is paid for by taxpayers, but officials do not provide a breakdown of costs, preferring to keep the operational details confidential. The expense would certainly rise if it involves deploying a protection team to Canada or the U.S. for months at a time.
Harry and Meghan point out on their website that this protection is “mandated” by Britain’s Home Office. It is not clear if the couple has the option of dropping its official protection and personally paying for any security they feel is warranted for themselves and their infant son Archie.
Will they still be royal?
Another question relates to whether they will retain their titles as His Royal Highness and Her Royal Highness. These are very high status titles, but the status they convey also greatly increases press scrutiny, which Harry and Meghan say they want to avoid because of its intrusive nature. It’s possible they could give up the titles voluntarily. It’s also possible the queen and others might feel they should give up their most prestigious titles if they are withdrawing from royal obligations.
What about their tax situation?
Harry and Meghan each have substantial assets of their own and any move to a new country could have a substantial impact on their tax liability. It's not yet clear how their personal finances would be affected by a move overseas, since they have not specified if they plan to move to the United States, possibly to the Los Angeles area where Meghan's mother lives, or to Canada, a Commonwealth country where they recently spent an extended holiday on Vancouver Island.
Meghan is an American citizen who is believed to be already paying taxes in the U.S. Harry could become liable for U.S. taxes if he spends enough time there, and they both could be exposed to Canadian taxes if they spend substantial amounts of time in that country. Working out these issues may be one factor that makes the royal crisis difficult to resolve quickly.