Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
Wisconsin's property tax cut will deliver biggest savings to landlords, business owners

Wisconsin's property tax cut will deliver biggest savings to landlords, business owners

  • 0
{{featured_button_text}}
American Family Insurance (copy)

American Family Insurance will save substantially more than the price of a pizza under the proposed property tax cut.

A property tax cut bill racing toward Gov. Scott Walker’s desk for a signature will indeed provide a few dollars of savings for most state homeowners.

For example, the owner of a $150,000 house on Madison’s east side stands to see a savings of about $17 on the December tax bill.

“We are returning $100 million to working families with a property tax cut because that's who the money belongs to,” said Sen. Alberta Darling, R-River Hills, in a statement after the bill was approved by the state Senate earlier this week.

But while the measure has been touted by both Republicans and Democrats as delivering tax relief to beleaguered Wisconsin homeowners, the big winners in actual dollar terms are the owners of large office complexes, apartment buildings and shopping malls.

In Madison, for instance, Stephen Brown Properties, the owners of the Lucky Apartments on the UW campus will realize some $5,400 in savings under the bill on that one building alone. That property at 777 University Avenue is assessed for tax purposes at $49.2 million.

American Family Insurance, which owns some $144 million worth of property in the city, will see its property tax bill drop by an estimated $15,900.

And CBL Properties of Chattanooga, Tenn., owner of East Towne and West Towne malls, will enjoy an $18,000 savings. Each mall is assessed for about $81 million, according to city tax records, with the owners paying almost $4 million total in property taxes last year.

Figures estimated for Madison properties were determined by assuming a cut of 11 cents per $1,000 in assessed value, a number provided by the Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance. Statewide, the tax cut — which is being delivered via increased public school aids — works out to about 8.8 cents per $1,000 of value, according to the Legislative Fiscal Bureau.

Wis Tax has also said because of the complicated school funding formula, the amount of tax savings varies widely among the state's 424 public school district, with 82 getting little or no reduction at all. 

In addition, the property tax cut has been criticized in some circles as a gimmick by Republicans to deflect attention away from the gubernatorial bid of Democrat Mary Burke. It has also been the subject of ridicule, with some saying Walker wants to buy everyone a pizza and call it a tax cut.

By their very nature, across-the-board tax cuts always benefit those who pay the most in taxes. The income tax cut included in the 2013-15 state budget did reduce rates and changed some of the brackets, but those with higher incomes still enjoyed the biggest cut in actual dollar terms.

Even if state officials wanted to target property tax reductions to a specific group that could really use some relief — say, owners of homes worth $250,000 or less — they couldn’t due to the "uniformity clause" in the Wisconsin Constitution that requires all property be taxed at the same rate.

“We can't do it any other way,” says Dale Knapp, research director at the Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance. “Everyone has to be taxed the same. Thus, everyone in a school district gets the same percentage cut. But that means that those that pay more get a bigger cut in dollar terms.”

The original Wisconsin Constitution adopted in 1848 requires “the rule of taxation shall be uniform.” But the uniformity clause has been amended five times, most recently in 1974 when it was changed to exempt agricultural and undeveloped land from the uniformity requirement.

The uniformity clause was initially intended to prevent the politicians from granting favorable tax treatment to their friends or influential property owners. At the time, Wisconsin was one of 10 states to have a uniformity clause in its constitution but today all but two states have uniformity clauses, though they vary in wording.

Be the first to know

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

News Alerts

Badger Sports

Breaking News

Crime

Politics