Skip to main content
You are the owner of this article.
You have permission to edit this article.
Renewable energy group sues PSC in effort to expand customer access
topical alert

Renewable energy group sues PSC in effort to expand customer access

  • 0
Solar Installation

Tyler Mairs, front, Paul Hainz, left, and Mike Eveland, of Full Spectrum Solar, install solar panels this week on a Middleton home on Dec. 30. Wisconsin regulators are wrestling with the question of leasing, which advocates say could make solar energy more accessible.

Renewable energy advocates are suing Wisconsin regulators over policies they say stifle the growth of the clean energy economy and deny customers access to innovative and cost-saving alternatives.

The lawsuit, filed Thursday on behalf of the Midwest Renewable Energy Association, argues the Public Service Commission has overstepped its authority by preventing non-utility companies from providing services such as financing.

David Bender, a staff attorney for Earthjustice, which is representing the Midwest Renewable Energy Association, said the PSC’s role “is to protect customers from the monopoly power of utilities, not to protect utilities when their customers want cleaner and more cost-effective options.”

Scientists have found that polar bears are using up to four times more energy in order to survive due to ice loss in the Arctic. The scientists say polar bears are using more energy for a reduced caloric intake than they previously had been. Polar bears feed mainly on the blubber of ringed and bearded seals, a food source that is becoming harder to come by. The areas of sea ice over shallow-water, which polar bears use for hunting seals, has shrunk 13% every decade since 1979. Polar bears are now having to swim for up to three days hunting for seals or rely on less energy-dense terrestrial food. A polar bear would have to eat 74 snow geese in order to equal the energy available from the blubber of one ringed seal. The scientists published their findings in the Journal of Experimental Biology.

The case, filed in Portage County Circuit Court, takes aim at “third-party financing,” which is essentially a way for customers to lease solar panels and avoid the hefty up-front costs.

Utilities oppose the practice, claiming only regulated monopolies are allowed to sell electricity in Wisconsin and therefore third-party ownership of panels is illegal.

The law, however, is ambiguous, and the PSC has so far declined to decide the question, though it may be forced to in a separate case involving We Energies and a solar developer seeking to provide third-party service to the city of Milwaukee.

A PSC spokesperson declined to comment, citing agency policy on litigation.

Midwest Renewable Energy Association executive director Nick Hylla said utilities are using “faulty” guidance — namely two letters written by PSC staff — “to strengthen their monopoly control and reduce options” for ratepayers.

Nick Hylla


“We have to put an end to the ‘can’t-do’ attitude of the past that produced Wisconsin’s outdated and overpriced fossil fuel infrastructure,” Hylla said in a statement. “We have better options.”

The complaint argues the policy discriminates against low-income residents and that third-party financing would expand rooftop solar, which would save all ratepayers money by reducing the need for expensive generation and transmission lines that come with near 10% profits for the utilities that build them.

The lawsuit also challenges a policy that prevents utility customers from reaping benefits of reducing their electricity.

Through programs known as “demand response,” customers can agree to have their loads reduced at times when demand is high. Since electricity supply and demand must always be in balance, controlled reductions in load offset the need to generate more electricity, so third-party aggregators that bundle lots of these agreements can then sell them in the wholesale electricity market.

A 2009 commission order prohibits customers of the five largest utilities from selling demand response in wholesale markets, which the Midwest Renewable Energy Association argues the commission lacked the legal authority to do.

“The Wisconsin Legislature delegated broad power to the Commission to regulate monopoly utilities,” the complaint states. “However, the Wisconsin Legislature never authorized the Commission to regulate private choices by Wisconsin families and businesses about whether and when to consume power or any aspect of competitive enterprise by nonutility businesses.”


Sign up for our Crime & Courts newsletter

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Badger Sports

Breaking News