When President Trump and his minions tried to mess with the census, they were messing with the U.S. Constitution and the best instincts of the American experiment. The Supreme Court recognized this and delivered a smackdown to the administration’s scheme to add a citizenship question to the survey. The administration allowed printing of census forms without the citizenship question. But appearances can be deceiving — as the president’s mixed-signal tweeting reminds us. The president has asserted that, no matter what courts say, he's still looking for a way to include the citizenship query. So advocates for an honest census must remain vigilant in defense of the ground that has been gained — recognizing the prospect that, as University of Wisconsin assistant law professor Robert Yablon suggested after the court ruling, “This is by no means over.”
Yet progressives must, at the same time, go on the offensive, embracing and promoting an understanding of the census as what it is: “a cornerstone of our democracy.”
That is how Wisconsin Sen. Tammy Baldwin and a group of her Democratic colleagues described the census last week in a letter urging the administration to end efforts to “delay and jeopardize the Census Bureau’s ability to conduct a full, fair, and accurate decennial census as required by the U.S. Constitution and the Census Act.”
That intervention by the senators was necessary, even after the high court ruled against the administration. The attempt by Trump and his allies to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census is just one of the threats posed by conservative charlatans who seek to game the processes of the federal government for political benefit. But it was a particularly serious one, and it was advanced so desperately — and dishonestly — by administration aides who were called out by the high court.
The assessment of the court’s decision from Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders was as blunt as it was accurate. “Trump lied about his motivations, and five justices called him on it,” said the Democratic presidential contender. “His proposal to add a citizenship question to the census was nothing but a racist attempt to disenfranchise communities of color.”
The lies that Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross and others told about the citizenship question were part of a dangerous political game that exploited vulnerabilities of a project that James Madison warned could be undone by partisan factions that “are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion or interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.”
From the start of what has now become his permanent campaign, Trump has imagined presidential powers that do not exist. And he has invited Americans to do the same, exploiting the fact that a lot of what people think is in the Constitution is not there. The founding document did not mention democracy, and it certainly did not outline universal voting rights. It did not propose political parties, primary elections or — and this may surprise Trump — the monarchical flight of fantasy that is “executive privilege.” But it did mention the census. Right up at the top, in Article 1, Section 2, the document requires that an “enumeration shall be made” within successive terms of 10 years. Practically, what that means is that since 1790 the federal government has organized a decennial counting of the people.
The point of this enumeration is a radical and democratizing one. The Founders of the American experiment, who had experienced colonial abuses that included taxation without representation, developed a strategy for counting every resident and using the results to establish representative democracy.
“Enshrining this invention in our Constitution marked a turning point in world history,” explains the Census Bureau. “Previously censuses had been used mainly to tax or confiscate property or to conscript youth into military service. The genius of the Founders was taking a tool of government and making it a tool of political empowerment for the governed over their government.”
The census is a protection against “the enemies to public liberty” that the wisest of the Founders feared might import to the new United States the kingly privileges and abuses against which the American Revolution was waged. The promise of representative democracy was not realized in the founding moment, or for decades, even centuries, after the Constitution was written. Sexism, racism, slavery, segregation, poll taxes and biases against urban centers erected barriers to universal suffrage. Even now, at a point when many of the old barriers have been removed, a new generation of Tories scheme to suppress the will of the people.
Few suppressions could be so severe as a mangling of the census. That’s the reason why civil rights, civil liberties and democracy groups rallied to prevent the addition of the citizenship question, which they warned would lead to confusion, fear and a severe undercount. This rallying of the forces of democracy was successful. But it cannot be the end of anything. It must be the beginning.
Now, a full count is possible, and it must be pursued aggressively by progressives.
The census is about much more than numbers. It is about empowerment. Centro Hispano Executive Director Karen Menéndez Coller said that the census can be “a game changer.” She is right. The Trump administration and its right-wing allies are trying to change the game to favor their political ambitions. It is our job to change it to favor democracy.
Share your opinion on this topic by sending a letter to the editor to firstname.lastname@example.org. Include your full name, hometown and phone number. Your name and town will be published. The phone number is for verification purposes only. Please keep your letter to 250 words or less.