Workers carrying bar image (copy) (copy) (copy) (copy)

Public projects in Wisconsin, such as the renovation of UW-Madison's Memorial Union, are no longer be subject to state prevailing wage requirements.

Andrew Disch of the North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters takes aim in an Aug. 3 Cap Times column at Associated Builders and Contractors of Wisconsin — a construction trade association founded on the merit shop philosophy — because we advocated strongly for the repeal of prevailing wage on public projects, an arcane and archaic system the writer tries to sell as “mainstream.”

Four years ago, Wisconsin took the first step to reform prevailing wage, a Great Depression-era remnant. The Legislature finally removed these outdated wage requirements for publicly-funded construction projects two years ago. Our members pushed for repeal because they believe in free and open competition, a far cry from the burdensome mandates of the 1930s that were in place under prevailing wage.

The writer makes it sound as if prevailing wage laws simply require construction workers on public projects be paid wages that are offered on similar job sites as if it’s just the “average wage.” That’s false. Wisconsin’s prevailing wage was either the union package or the weighted average of only the top half of wages reported from a survey of contractors. Very often, the “prevailing wages” were not actually the prevailing wages. They would not accurately reflect the market wages, which could make it especially difficult for smaller municipalities to pay inflated construction costs.

The writer scorned those of us who oppose the concept of “inflated wages” by conflating the term with “rising wages.”

Rising wages are great for workers. Artificially inflated wages on public projects, however, are horrible for taxpayers. There is a big difference between the two.

The writer makes prevailing wage sound like a saving grace from open bidding on public projects, which he says are “awarded blindly to the lowest bidder.” It’s much more accurate to say that public projects are awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. Many municipalities have extensive pre-bid qualification processes, which require qualifying contractors to provide data and thorough responses to multiple pages of detailed questions. This protects taxpayers against what the writer calls “carpetbagging shops” and “shoddy contractors.”

Hear voices

Get the Cap Times Opinion email delivered to you!

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

The writer attempts to discredit Associated Builders and Contractors of Wisconsin for our merit-based principles. Interestingly, many other prominent organizations — such as the Wisconsin Association of School Boards, the Wisconsin Counties Association and the Municipal Electric Utilities of Wisconsin — all supported the repeal of prevailing wage laws in this state. They supported repeal of Wisconsin’s prevailing wage laws because they knew they could get more work done using fewer tax dollars without these burdensome mandates in place.

There are many falsehoods you will hear from construction unions who want to discredit opponents of prevailing wage. That’s because these special interest groups stand to gain financially from it, at the expense of taxpayers and free-market principles. The truth is that since prevailing wage was repealed in Wisconsin, apprenticeship numbers are at a 10-year high, construction wages continue to increase faster than inflation, and virtually every construction union contract was renegotiated with a wage increase. All occurred without prevailing wage.

John Mielke is president of Associated Builders and Contractors of Wisconsin, which advocates for merit, or performance-based construction.

Share your opinion on this topic by sending a letter to the editor to tctvoice@madison.com. Include your full name, hometown and phone number. Your name and town will be published. The phone number is for verification purposes only. Please keep your letter to 250 words or less.