Oates: Inconsistent Evridge not the sole problem
10/6/2008
Wisconsin State Journal
SPORTS
Text Size: A A A
Page 1 of 1
Email this article Email
Print this article Print

Not since Brooks Bollinger replaced first-year starter Scott Kavanagh for the sixth game of the 1999 season has the University of Wisconsin football team made an in-season change at quarterback that wasn't dictated by injury.

Bollinger, a highly touted redshirt freshman back in 1999, replaced the injured Kavanagh at Ohio State and rallied UW to a 42-17 victory. Even though Kavanagh could have returned the next week against Minnesota, former coach Barry Alvarez went with Bollinger and never regretted it.

Indeed, knee-jerk reactions during the season haven't been the modus operandi at UW under Alvarez or current coach Bret Bielema. Not at quarterback. Not at many positions, for that matter.

Some think stability is especially important at quarterback. The Badgers had a quarterback derby during each of the last two training camps, but once Bielema named his starter, that was it. There was never a hint, at least publicly, of a potential change.

Given that history, it was quite a surprise Monday when Bielema said senior quarterback Allen Evridge would start Saturday's game against sixth-ranked Penn State but would be on a short leash if his performance didn't improve. In confirming that junior quarterback Dustin Sherer had been officially placed on stand-by, Bielema indicated that the coaches have grown tired of Evridge's inconsistency after only five games as a starter.

Bielema promised a review of many areas after UW lost its second straight game to drop to 3-2 on the season, but Evridge's lack of accuracy throwing the ball is a big reason the offense has underperformed since the competition got tougher in the last three games. It is not, however, the only reason, and Evridge shouldn't be made the scapegoat for UW's disappointing 0-2 start in the Big Ten Conference.

Young receivers have dropped passes. Tight ends Travis Beckum and Garrett Graham, the two most experienced pass-catchers on the team, have missed time because of injury. The line didn't pass-block as well against Michigan and Ohio State as it did in the first three games. And the running attack hasn't been as consistently productive as it was earlier, putting more pressure on Evridge to keep drives alive by throwing the ball.

Certainly, Evridge hasn't been as bad as some of UW's howling fans seem to think. Tyler Donovan, also a one-year starter, had a few rough moments last year, but Donovan's incredible toughness won over fans and muted some of the criticism he might otherwise have received.

Evridge has been extremely inconsistent, however. He has good size and a strong arm, but he's been guilty of holding the ball too long, hasn't made plays with his feet like Donovan did and, as Bielema pointed out, has missed open receivers with his passes.

Evridge might be able to iron out those problems in time. The problem is, with two Big Ten losses and red-hot Penn State coming to town, the Badgers are out of time.

If Evridge doesn't improve his level of play, Bielema needs to go to Plan B. And while he's at it, Bielema might want to put a few more people on short leashes this week. That includes players and coaches.

Text Size: A A A
Page 1 of 1
Email this article Email
Print this article Print
11 comment posts
Last Reply: 10/9/2008 5:34 PM
Oates: Inconsistent Evridge not the sole problem
(10/9/2008 5:34 PM)
Titleisttim says:
Here's the deal; Our offensive line averages 6' 3" and 310 lbs, we have sticky figured tight ends, lanky and speedy wide receivers, guys that will go over the middle and may I mention 3 of the best tailbacks in the Big Ten. So I ask. Why oh why can't this coaching staff recruit a top-notch quarterback? It is the offense that is the problem. Non-sustaining drives leaves our defense on the field too long and in the 4th quarter it gets tough. My evidence, the last 2-weeks.
(10/9/2008 10:02 AM)
SF Badger says:
What are the QB stats for two Big Ten games -- three INT's and four fumbles? Do we really think we could be 2-0 or 1-1 with those stats? Unlikely. Do we think making John Clay the #1 RB will fix that stat over the rest of the schedule? Unlikely. The QB makes "it" happen on offense. Think about the group of previous UW QBs over the past 10 years. What was the quote from the defensive coordinator???...there was too much crowd noise for our D to hear the alignment just before Pryor ran it in from 11 yds. Wow. OSU was able to get their play called and they even ran it on a quick count because they saw we weren't set. Better coaching from their sideline vs ours? They were ready. We weren't.
(10/7/2008 10:19 PM)
BigTenFan says:
http://blogs.jsonline.com/badgers/archive/2008/10/06/bielema-candid-about-osu-loss.aspx

Check out this link to the Milwaukee paper.. BB did not know what was going on??? Huh?? And he is busy blaming his players?? Tick tock, BB!!
(10/7/2008 5:57 PM)
Dave Rice says:
Before Bielema criticizes Evridge, he and Paul Crist should look in the mirror. They are playing our best offensive player on the third string. How much longer are they going to demoralize John Clay, who is a far superior back to PJ Hill, before Clay leaves Wisconsin and goes to some top ten program where they will start him and give him 30 carries a game? Clay would be a star for just about any team in the country except Wisconsin. Here he's third string and gets three or four carries a game.
(10/7/2008 2:31 PM)
Stickaforkinthem says:
"And the running attack hasn't been as consistently productive as it was earlier, putting more pressure on Evridge to keep drives alive by throwing the ball." I want to agree with that statment, I think? But when teams are continuing to line up 8-9 guys in the box, I'm sorry to disagree, UW needs to improve passing the ball. The last three games have proven that the receivers are there, Evridge just can't find them. The pass protection has been shaky, I agree. All of the other factors can be attributed to a team that has average-solid talent and no more. The turnovers are also a big problem. UW football, and their style of play, depends on NOT turning over the football. If that happens, UW can struggle against a WSUC team.
(10/7/2008 12:15 PM)
tim says:
What did ever happened to mixing up the play calls? what happened to the naked bootleg? Running to the outside? Running to the outside and sending the tight end to the opposite side WITH the naked bootleg? What happened to the fire? What happened to trying to win and not just trying to lose? why do we not pressure on 3rd and long, since every time we don't, we give up 17 yards over hte middle? mmmmmmm...
(10/7/2008 12:13 PM)
B says:
I'm not seeing Evridge as the problem, or the main problem. The offense hasn't lacked that much for yards and points. Yes, it could do better, especially at turnovers. Another thing is the lack of any decent wideouts.

A bigger problem is defense. Giving up 27 points in the 2nd half at Michigan, giving up a couple of big scoring drives in the second half to OSU - the defense is NOT getting it done, and they look TERRIBLE.
(10/7/2008 12:03 PM)
kayakguy says:
I largely agree with Mr Forster,above. The play action pass should be our bread and butter pass play. Also Evridge tends to take a 3 step drop when he drops back, and quickly finds himself in the middle of a muddle, presuring him to throw quicker (as opposed to a 5 or 7 step drop). In addition, we aren't good enough to play not to lose...we have to keep trying to win, no matter the score. we need to be less predictable on offense....whenever we have had a lead, we have gone to our "constitpated offense", three 2-yard-runs in a row by PJ Hill and then punt. Albeit those were 4 or 5 yard runs aginst Akron and Marshall, but Big Ten defenses don't let you get away with that totally predictable stuff. Unfortunately, the competition gets much stiffer this weekend. we need John Clay in there as much as he can handle. We are much more explosive with him in the lineup..a blind man could see that. We will really struggle to try to beat Penn St and/or Illinois, even at home, but less predictability in our offense would take us a long way there.
(10/7/2008 11:19 AM)
chill says:
So go with the Junior, and then we can start over looking for a quarterback after next year.
(10/7/2008 10:19 AM)
MARK FORSTER says:

IT MAY NOT BE TOO LATE FOR A BIG TEN TITLE, BUT THE ONLY WAY IT WILL HAPPEN IS IF THE BADGERS WIN THE REST OF THEIR GAMES AND GET HELP FROM OTHER BIG 10 TEAMS.

I THINK PLAY CALLING HAS BEEN SOMEWHAT SUSPECT ALSO. IF JOHN CLAY IS GAINING YARDS AND PJ HILL ISN'T, THEN MAKE CLAY THE STARTER. ALSO, I BELIEVE THERE'S BEEN A SIGNIFICANT DROP IN PLAY ACTION PASSES THIS YEAR. WHY? IF YOU HAVE 2ND AND GOAL AT THE 1, YOU'VE GOT TO FIGURE THE WRONG PLAY IS TO GIVE THE BALL TO PJ HILL UP THE MIDDLE. THAT'S NOT A SLAM ON PJ, BUT YOU KNOW THE DEFENSE WILL BE KEYING ON HIM. IN SUCH A SITUATION, JOHN STOCCO WAS BRILLIANT AT EXECUTING A PLAY ACTION PASS.

I WAS ALSO SURPRISED THAT DUSTIN SCHERER DIDN'T GET SIGNIFICANT PLAYING TIME ONCE THE AKRON AND MARSHALL GAMES WERE IN THE BAG.

WILL BRETT AND PAUL LISTEN TO ME? NO THEY WON'T AND THE TROUBLES WILL CONTINUE UNTIL THEY DO.
(10/7/2008 8:31 AM)
Chuck Ellis says:
Finally! I am frankly not surprised that Bret has gotten to this point. He is one of the best, most postive,most committed and smartest coaches in the country and I know his decsions would not be impetuous. But, it is time to take a serious look at Evridge given his lack of production, consistency and what appears to be a real flaw in the ability to be decisve and pull the trigger. He has very good recivers including the backs and he constantly looks, looks and gets into trouble. When he does throw it is usually past the optimal point and his accuracy has been suspect as well. Frankly, if this is the way he executes the passing attack, he would be better to pull up and run more often (which seemed to be his historical strength). All in all, the Badgers with all their tools and great coahing will never reach their potential with Evridge at QB. It is not like he is a freshman with loads of potential that is worth investing in for growth, he is a fifth year senior who you would expect would at least bring the maturity and poise to be effective,not great, just effective. Bret will and has figured it out, my concern is that it maybe too late to salvage the chance for a Big 10 title.
Go Badgers!
This email is never shared.
Badgerbeat.com monitors COMMENTS posted online. We reserve the right to edit or delete any message or shut down a disucssion at any time if, in our judgement, comments become offensive, threatening or libelous. Poster Terms and Conditions
BadgerBeat.com Copyright 2008 Capital Newspapers, Inc.